If you suspect adult ADHD, the Adult ADHD Self-Report Scale (ASRS v1.1) is usually the first place to start. It’s fast, structured, and clinically grounded. When used well, it helps clarify whether a full ADHD assessment is warranted and where to focus the clinical interview.
This blog explains what the ASRS is, how it works, how scoring is calculated, and how to interpret results - alongside a calculator that applies the official thresholds accurately.
What the Adult ADHD Self Report Scale Is
The ASRS v1.1 is an 18-item self-report symptom checklist designed for adults age 18+. It asks about the past 6 months and uses a frequency scale from Never → Very often. It’s meant to support screening and symptom monitoring - not to diagnose ADHD on its own.
Purpose and scope
- Screening: Quick identification of adults who may warrant a fuller ADHD evaluation.
- Interview structure: Helps you focus your assessment on concrete functional examples and impairment.
- Monitoring: Can be repeated over time if you keep administration consistent (timeframe, context, medication timing).
Who it’s for
- Adults with concerns about attention, organization, follow-through, restlessness, or impulsivity.
- Clinicians in primary care, outpatient mental health, and telehealth who need a quick standardized screen.
- Not for children (use pediatric measures for under 18).
Origins and alignment
The ASRS was developed in collaboration with the World Health Organization and researchers affiliated with Harvard’s National Comorbidity Survey work. The 18 items map to DSM-era symptom domains and remain widely used in adult ADHD screening workflows.
ASRS Components at a Glance
The ASRS has a simple structure that matters for scoring:
- Part A (6 items): The “core screener.” These items were selected to best predict likely adult ADHD in population research.
- Part B (12 items): Adds symptom breadth and clinical nuance, but does not determine screen status by itself.
- Domains: 9 items reflect inattention and 9 reflect hyperactivity/impulsivity.
Response scale and timeframe
- Timeframe is past 6 months (this is the single most common scoring error in real-world use).
- Frequency options run from Never to Very often.
Quick table
What you’re looking at | What it’s for | What you do with it |
|---|
Part A (6 items) | Screen-positive flag | Count responses that fall in the shaded threshold boxes; 4+ = positive screen |
Part B (12 items) | Symptom detail | Use patterns to guide interview and impairment review |
Inattention vs Hyperactivity/Impulsivity pattern | Clinical “shape” of symptoms | Helps you target examples, supports treatment planning |
How to Use the ASRS in Practice
Before you start (30 seconds that prevent messy data)
- Confirm the respondent is 18+.
- Explain: “This is a screen for ADHD symptoms. It doesn’t diagnose ADHD.”
- Anchor the timeframe: “Think about the past 6 months.”
- Ask for “typical days,” not best days or worst weeks.
Step-by-step completion
- Have the client select one frequency per item.
- Encourage quick best estimates. Overthinking tends to drift toward “sometimes” for everything.
- If literacy or attention is a barrier, read items aloud and clarify frequency anchors without coaching the “right” answer.
Scoring the scale
- Part A screen: Count how many Part A responses fall in the shaded boxes. 4+ shaded = positive screen.
- Part B: Look for reinforcing patterns (e.g., chronic disorganization, sustained attention issues, impulsivity markers).
- Optional (helpful clinically): Summarize inattention vs hyperactivity/impulsivity pattern as a “profile,” not a total score.
Interpreting results (what “positive” really means)
A positive Part A screen means: “Further assessment is indicated.” It does not confirm ADHD. The next steps are where clinicians add the value:
- Impairment check: Work/school performance, home management, relationships, driving/safety, finances, routines.
- Developmental course: ADHD is neurodevelopmental—symptoms should be present since earlier life, even if the client didn’t label them that way at the time.
- Differential + comorbidity: ADHD-like symptoms show up across many conditions (and ADHD often co-occurs with them).
High-yield differential prompts (fast)
Consider | What can mimic ADHD | What to ask/verify |
|---|
Anxiety disorders | Distractibility from worry/hypervigilance | When attention drops: during worry spikes or across contexts? |
Depression | Low drive, slowed processing, poor concentration | Is the “attention problem” episodic with mood? |
Bipolar spectrum | Impulsivity, sleep disruption, goal-directed bursts | Any hypomanic history, decreased need for sleep? |
Sleep disorders | Inattention, irritability, executive dysfunction | Sleep duration/quality, snoring, shift work |
Substance use / caffeine | Focus variability, rebound symptoms | Timing, amounts, withdrawal/rebound patterns |
Medical (e.g., thyroid) | Restlessness, concentration issues | Recent labs, medical review as indicated |
Communicating with the patient (a simple script)
- “This result suggests ADHD is possible, and it’s worth doing a full evaluation.”
- “A lot of things affect attention—sleep, anxiety, depression, stress, substance use—so we’ll look at the whole picture.”
- “We’ll focus on both symptoms and impairment, because impairment is what drives treatment planning.”
Clinical Pearls and Common Pitfalls
Pearls
- Use ASRS early to structure your interview around concrete examples (missed deadlines, forgotten tasks, chronic lateness, impulsive spending, driving issues).
- Track function, not just symptoms. ADHD treatment planning gets clearer when you document impairment in 2–3 domains.
- Treat the domain pattern as a conversation starter: “Where do you see this most - work, home, relationships?”
Pitfalls
- Wrong timeframe. The ASRS is past 6 months, not “last week.”
- Over-weighting a “total score” mindset instead of impairment + course.
- Missing sleep, mood, anxiety, substance, and bipolar spectrum factors.
- Ignoring medication timing (stimulants, antidepressants, caffeine) when interpreting symptom frequency.
Equity and access
- Use validated translations from official sources when possible.
- Offer read-aloud administration when attention, literacy, or disability impacts completion.
- Be mindful of cultural expectations around activity level and “productivity” norms.
Reliability, Validity, and Norms (brief, clinician-useful)
Evidence supports the ASRS v1.1 as a useful adult ADHD screener, with published work showing strong specificity in some population contexts and reasonable sensitivity depending on setting and methodology. It’s best used the way it was designed: as a screen paired with clinical review, not as a stand-alone diagnostic tool.
Clinically, the most defensible use is:
- Part A: decide whether to proceed to fuller evaluation.
- Pattern review: focus your interview and treatment planning.
- Repeat administration: monitor change over time if your conditions stay consistent.
References
Conclusion
The ASRS v1.1 is a fast, structured way to screen adult ADHD symptoms and organize your assessment. Use Part A to decide whether a fuller evaluation is warranted, then use Part B and domain patterns to guide your interview. Anchor interpretation in impairment, developmental course, and differential diagnosis. And if you’re using a calculator, make sure it applies the official Part A shaded thresholds consistently - because that’s where most scoring mistakes happen.